Aortic valve
- Technical
Aortic Root Enlargement - Nicks/Manougian
Aortic annular enlargement - Y incision (modified Nicks)
David Aortic root reconstruction - Incl how to make the coronary buttons
Video
- Patient selection
Asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis - Intervention of conservative care - RCT, N:145, asymptomatic patients with very severe aortic stenosis
Minna mortality með aðgerð en conservative, 6 ára follow up, Mortality 7% vs 21%, favouring surgery
Severe aortic stenosis, RCT, Intermediate risk patients(4-8% 30d mortality) (Partner 2, sponsored by TAVI company):
More crossover in surgery group (7,5%vs 1,7%)
2 year: (sAVR/TAVI%): Death 18/16,7, stroke 8,9/9,5, Aortic valve reintervention 0,5/0,7, A fib 27,5/11,5
5 year: (sAVR/TAVI%): Death 42,1/46, stroke 12,5/15,3, Aortic valve reintervention 0,8/3,2, A fib 30,4/15,8
Severe aortic stenosis, RCT, low-risk patients (<4% 30d mortality) (Partner 3, sponsored by Edwards)
1000 patients, TAVR vs sAVR, 8,6% withdrawal from sAVR group, 1,4% from TAVR group, concomitant procedures in 26,4% sAVR group, 7,9% TAVR group, mean age 73 years, STS score 1,9%
1 year: (sAVR/TAVR%): Death 2,5/1,0 (NS), Stroke 3,1/1,2 (NS), Death or disabling stroke 3,1/1,0, composite endpoint (death, stroke, rehospitalization) 15,1/8,5
2 year: (sAVR/TAVR): Death 3,2/2,4 (NS), Stroke 3,6/2,4 (NS), Death or disabling stroke 3,8/3,0 (NS), composite endpoint (death, stroke, rehospitalization) 17,1/11,5
Study outcome variables are diverging, The Mean gradient is statistically but not clinically significant (11,8/13,6), favoring surgery, PVL 2,3/26,0
5 year: (sAVR/TAVR): Death 8,2/10 (NS), Stroke 6,4/5,8 (NS), Death or disabling stroke Not reported?, composite endpoint (death, stroke, rehospitalization) 27,2/22,8 (NS)
Severe Aortic Stenosis, RCT, Low-risk patients (Evolut Low Risk). STS score 1,9-2. 1400 patients
4 year: (sAVR/TAVR): Death 12,1/9,0 (NS), Stroke 3,8/2,9 (NS), Composite (Death/Stroke) 14,1/10,7
Severe aortic stenosis, STS Registry, Low-risk patients, 42 500 patients, 8 year follow-up
Same inclusion criteria as Partner 3/Evolut Low Risk. 1, 3, 5, 8-year mortality (2,6%, 4,5%, 7,1%, 12,4%). Dramatically less than industry-sponsored RCTs
Severe aortic stenosis, RCT sAVR/TAVI, intermediate-risk patients (STS 4,5±1,6%, 79,8±6,2 years), N: 1660 (SURTAVI)
2 year follow-up: Mortality 11,6%/11,4% (NS), Stroke 8,4%/6,2% (NS)
5-year follow-up: Presented at TCT 2021, Mortality 30,8%/31,3% (NS)
Severe aortic stenosis, RCT, >69 years, all-comers (Notion): TAVI/sAVR, 280 patients, 79,1±4,8 years old, STS score 3±1,7%
1 year follow-up: Mortality 4,9%/7,5% (NS), Stroke 2,9%/4,6% (NS)
5-year follow-up: Mortality 27,6%/28,9% (NS), Stroke 9%/7,4% (NS), Lower gradients in TAVI group, 8,2% developed moderate/severe AI vs none in surgical group, more pacemakers in TAVI group, more atrial fibrillation in sAVR group
10-year follow-up: Mortality 62,7%/64,0% (NS), Stroke 9,7%/16,4% (NS) More severe SVD in SAVR group (10% vs 1,5%), more PVL in TAVI (18% vs 5,2%). Same IE risk, 7,3%
Meta analysis of 6 RCTs, >6 000 patients, TAVI/SAVR
Lower 1 year mortality, HR 0,85
Superior results after 40 months, for SAVR. HR 1,31 (40-60 months)
- Prosthesis/Technique selection
mAVR/bAVR in non-elderly - Minnkað life expectancy með báðum týpum
bAVR - Mortality risk: 2,39%/year, reintervention: 1,82%/year, structural valve deterioration 1,59%/year, thromboembolism 0,53%/year, endocarditis: 0,48%/year,
mAVR - Mortality risk: 1,55%/year, thromboembolism: 0,9%/year, major bleeding:0,85%/year, non-structural valve deterioration: 0,49%/year, endocarditis: 0,41%/year, reintervention: 0,51%/year
Expected durability of biological aortic valves:
Structural valve deterioration: A gradual process of dysfunction secondary to stenosis (40%), insufficiency (30%) or a combination (30%). No universal definition but basically a new severe stenosis (calcification and pannus) or insufficiency (Leaflet tear)
Pericardial valves have a tendency to develop stenosis, porcine valves insufficiency
Risk factors for SVD: Younger age at implantation, hypercalcemia, hyperphosphatemia, renal failure, arterial hypertension, PPM (increased stress on valve), larger BSA, diabetes, smoking,
Surgical bioprosthesis freedom from SVD: 10 year 90,2%, 15 year 73,7%, 20 year 60%
Operative risk for aortic valve replacement reoperation is between 5,8-12,8%,
Valve in valve TAVI after SVD: 1 year mortality of 15%, 30 day at 8%, 95% success rate
Aortic valve sparing vs composite: Mean follow-up 5,8 ár
Same early mortality, bleeding, MI, thromboembolism
Significantly less late mortality with AVS (RR 0,68), Thromboembolism/Stroke (0,36) and bleeding (0,21)
ON-X Valves - Reduced Anticoagulation regiment: RCT, N=190 usual Warfarin regiment (2-3), N=185 INR 1,5-2,0 + 81 mg Aspirin
3,82 years of mean follow-up, major bleeding 3,26/1,48%/pt-yr, minor bleeding 3,41/1,32%/pt-yr, stroke 0,74/1,12%/pt-yr (NS), TIA 1,33/0,79%/pt-yr (NS)
Aortic Valve Repair Techniques
Concepts of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Repair
- Prognosis
PPM - Aukið renal failure, stroke og late mortality með moderate og severe PPM (x1,5 og x2,5)
PPM review - PPM er algengt og hættulegt, líklega hættulegast early post op þegar vi slegill er viðkvæmastur
Bicuspid aortic valve - Heritability ca 10% i 1° ættingjum, ca 10x líklegra í nánum ættingjum, 0,5-2,0% almennri population
Woldentorp et al - Syst review/Meta analys of TAVI patients - 3456 patients, 11,5% had subclinical valve thrombosis, that group had 3x the risk of stroke
Reop after TAVR - 123 patients, retroactive series on TAVR patients surgically reoperated - Mortality 17,1%, Observed mortality was higher than predicted STS score mortality
Pannus occurence on mechanical valves - Retrospective, 862 pat,
Incidence: 10 yr:0,3%, 20 yr: 5%, 25 yr: 9,9%
Risk factors: Small prosthesis (HR 0,74), Young age (HR 0,94), concomitant mitral valve replacement (HR 3,863)
Ross procedure outperforms mechanical and biologic valves